On Shear in Members Without Stirrups and the Application of Energy-Based Methods in Light of 30 Years of Test Observations

Abstract

In a recent paper in Structural Concrete, the authors Dönmez and Bažant explain that the theoretical background of the Model Code 2010 equations for one way and punching shear are not sufficiently grounded in theory and should instead use an energybased size effect law in their formulation to match behavior. To support this claim, finite element simulations were presented. In this paper the basic assumption that an energy-based method must govern the shear failure of beams without stirrups is questioned. These questions are shown to be based on the hardening behavior of aggregate interlock tests and the inability for slip strains to localize during shear failure. In addition to these theoretical arguments finite element analyses were conducted with a constitutive model that is energy-based but that also does an appropriate job at modeling aggregate interlock, an aspect that appears to be lacking in the analyses of Dönmez and Bažant. These new results are shown to better model the test results and confirm that aggregate interlock is important in explaining shear strength and therefore the size effect in shear for slender members. As such any concerns about the safety of the Model Code shear equations appear unwarranted.

Translated by Lisbel Rueda from the original article published in the Journal Structural Concrete, published by Wiley: Bentz EC, Foster SJ. On shear in members without stirrups and the application of energy-based methods in light of 30 years of test observations. Structural Concrete. 2019; 20: 1481–1489. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900224